³ÉÈËÓ°Òô

View the related practice notes about Ordinary share

Practical steps involved in implementing growth shares

Practical steps involved in implementing growth shares What are growth shares and are they appropriate? Growth shares, also known as value shares or hurdle shares, are a special class of shares that have restricted rights. These rights are designed to allow employees only to participate in post-acquisition increases in the value of the company. For more detailed explanation of the key features of growth shares and when they are normally introduced by a company, see Practice Note: Growth shares (value shares). Key features of growth shares Growth shares are specially constituted and classified under the articles of association of the company as a separate class of shares from the existing shares in the company. They will be issued to selected employees and will be subject to the provisions of the articles of association and also either to the subscription agreement that each participating employee will be asked to sign or the option documentation that they enter into, where the employee acquires their growth shares via an option over...

SAYE—companies which qualify to operate an SAYE scheme

SAYE—companies which qualify to operate an SAYE scheme This Practice Note covers the following topics: • the law governing eligibility for companies to operate a save as you earn (SAYE) scheme • requirements and timing • the aims of the SAYE legislation • the legislative requirements for shares under SAYE schemes, including: ◦ requirement for shares to form part of ordinary share capital ◦ issues for group companies ◦ issues for a company which is controlled by another company ◦ issues for a company which is owned or controlled by a consortium ◦ issues for a company which is controlled by an unlisted company ◦ issues for jointly owned companies ◦ when is a company listed on a recognized stock exchange? ◦ fully paid up and redeemable shares, and ◦ requirements if there is more than one class of ordinary shares • checks and declarations regarding the shares, and • references to shares in the SAYE scheme For further information on SAYE schemes generally, see Practice Note:...

View the related precedents about Ordinary share

Irrevocable undertaking—shareholder—scheme of arrangement

Irrevocable undertaking—shareholder—scheme of arrangement The Directors [insert offeror's name] ([Offeror]) [insert address] [and] [The Directors] [[insert name of financial adviser] (the Adviser) [insert address]] [insert date] Dear Directors Proposed acquisition of [name of offeree] ([Offeree]) We understand that [Offeror] proposes to acquire (the Acquisition) [all] the issued [and to be issued] [ordinary] shares of [insert nominal value] each in [Offeree] (the Shares) for the consideration, and otherwise substantially on the terms and subject to the conditions, set out in the draft press announcement attached to this letter (the Announcement), subject to such amendments or additions to such terms and conditions as may be required by the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the Code), the Panel on Takeovers and Mergers (the Panel), the High Court of Justice in England and Wales (the Court) or any applicable law or regulation. We also understand that the Acquisition is expected to be implemented by way of a scheme of arrangement under...

Phantom share option agreement

Phantom share option agreement This AGREEMENT is made on [insert date of execution of the phantom share option agreement] Parties 1 [insert name of company whose shares are relevant to the phantom option] (registered number [insert registered number of company]) whose registered office is at [insert registered address of company] (the Company); and 2 [insert name of option holder] of [insert address of option holder] (the Option Holder) Background (A) The Company has agreed to grant to the Option Holder as at the date of this Agreement a Phantom Option on the terms set out in this Agreement. (B) The Phantom Option provides an entitlement to cash and not shares. 1 Definitions In this Agreement, except where the context otherwise requires, the words and expressions set out below will bear the following meanings, namely: Cash Payment • means the cash sum payable on the exercise of the Phantom Option, which shall be calculated in accordance with clause 6.2; Control • has the meaning given...

View the related q&as about Ordinary share

Can an enterprise management incentives (EMI) option holder claim business asset disposal relief in relation to the sale of shares resulting from the exercise of an EMI option if a disqualifying event has previously occurred?

Can an enterprise management incentives (EMI) option holder claim business asset disposal relief in relation to the sale of shares resulting from the exercise of an EMI option if a disqualifying event has previously occurred? Business asset disposal relief (BADR) is a reduced rate of capital gains tax (CGT) that individuals or trustees, but not companies, can claim when they dispose of business assets. Certain conditions must be met before the relief will apply. In relation to disposals made after 6 April 2025, the effect of the relief is to reduce the rate of CGT on the disposal to 14% on a lifetime limit of gains of up to £1m. Previously, the rate of CGT that applied when BADR was available was 10%, but this was increased by the Finance Act 2025, which also legislated that the rate would be further increased to 18% for disposals made on or after 6 April 2026. For details of the qualifying conditions for BADR and the lifetime limit that applies to it, see...

View the related News about Ordinary share

Spreadsheet says 'no', Tribunal says 'yes'! FTT accepts rectification for entrepreneurs' relief (Cooke v HMRC)

Private Client analysis: In 2019, Jonathan Cooke sold his entire shareholding in ISG Holdings Ltd (IHL) and realised a gain of approximately £600,000. Mr Cooke had initially acquired his shareholding under a commercial agreement to take a 5% share in the company. Due to a spreadsheet error, he only actually acquired 4.999% of the ordinary share capital, or less than the 5% holding needed to qualify for entrepreneurs' relief. HMRC accordingly denied the claim. Mr Cooke appealed on grounds that if appropriate proceedings were brought in the High Court, it would order a rectification of the original acquisition documents (providing that Mr Cooke in fact held 5%) and accordingly the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) should proceed on the basis the rectification had been ordered and allow the claim for entrepreneurs' relief. The taxpayer won. Written by Tom Rank, partner, and Calum Young, associate, both at DWF.