"We rely on ³ÉÈËÓ°Òô to give us a definitive answer, quickly and reliable every time so that we can be confident in the advice we use to help our clients."
Shelter
Access all documents on Fraudulent trading
The carrying on of the business of a company with intent to defraud creditors of the company or creditors of any other person, or for any fraudulent effect, as set out under the Insolvency Act 1986, s 213.
Claims for fraudulent trading can be brought against anyone who was a knowing party to the carrying on of the business in question, not only directors, and any such person may be declared to be liable to make such contributions to the company's assets as the court thinks proper. Such claims can only be brought by the liquidator of the company in question in the course of its winding up.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.
For our full legal glossary and more legal research sources, register for a free Lexis+ trial
A summary checklist and timeline for bringing misfeasance, fraudulent trading and wrongful trading claims under sections 212, 213, 246ZA, 214 and 246ZB of the Insolvency Act 1986 Checklist This Checklist is in relation to claims under sections 212–214, 246ZA and 246ZB of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), being commenced by an insolvency office-holder. For further reading on claims under IA 1986, ss 212–214, 246ZA and 246ZB generally, see Practice Notes: • Misfeasance claims under section 212 of the Insolvency Act 1986 • Fraudulent trading claims under sections 213 and 246ZA of the Insolvency Act 1986 • Wrongful trading claims under sections 214 and 246ZB of the Insolvency Act 1986 Step/action Time (days) Section/rule 1. Investigate the events and circumstances leading to the insolvency of the company and the matters giving rise to the claim(s) against the respondent(s). This would include obtaining the company's books and records, interviewing directors, former directors and any persons with information concerning the promotion, formation, business, dealings, affairs or property of the company.It...
Offences for which a DPA may be entered into—checklist A deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) is an agreement between an organisation and a designated prosecutor to enable the latter to defer a prosecution by staying an indictment on specific terms. No proceedings in relation to the matters covered by the DPA may be instituted against the organisation while the DPA remains in force. A DPA therefore allows a company to continue without the threat of a lengthy criminal investigation and a costly prosecution hanging over it. For detailed information on DPAs, see Practice Notes: • Deferred prosecution agreements • DPA process • Terms and content of a DPA • DPAs in practice DPA’s are only available to organisations in respect of the offences specified under the Crime and Courts Act 2013, Sch 17 (CCA 2013). The checklist below, lists the offences for which a DPA may be entered into, including common law and statutory offences. In addition to the offences below, any offence that is ancillary to those listed below,...
Discover our 2 Checklists on Fraudulent trading
A fraudulent trading claim arises under two separate statutory routes: •it is a criminal offence under section 993 of the Companies Act 2006•a civil remedy arises under sections 213 and 246ZA of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986)This Practice Note deals with the latter.What is fraudulent trading?Fraudulent trading is a claim which arises under IA 1986, s 213 (liquidation) or IA 1986, s 246ZA (administration) and seeks to recover property to the company's assets where:•the company has been wound up or entered administration, and•the business of the company was carried on with the intent:◦to defraud its creditors, and/or◦to defraud creditors of any other person(s), and/or◦for any other fraudulent purpose(s)In the circumstances, negligence or incompetence will not be sufficient.Who can commence a fraudulent trading claim?Historically, fraudulent trading claims could only be brought by a liquidator.However, since 1 October 2015 both liquidators and administrators can bring them.Aside from contextual differences, given that the wording of IA 1986, ss 213 and 246ZA is the same it is likely that the decisions concerning fraudulent...
Fraudulent tradingFraudulent trading by a company is an offence prohibited by section 993 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006). Section 9 of the Fraud Act 2006 (FrA 2006), makes fraudulent trading by sole traders, partnerships and trusts and other non-corporate entities a criminal offence. See Practice Note: Fraudulent trading under the Fraud Act 2006.The offence under CA 2006, s 993 is triable either in the magistrates' court or the Crown Court.Elements of CA 2006 offence of fraudulent tradingThere are two limbs to this offence:•carrying on the business of a company with intent to defraud creditors of the company or the creditors of any other person, the elements of which are:◦carrying on the business of a company◦with intent to defraud creditors of the company or the creditors of any other person, and ◦knowingly being a party to that activity•carrying on the business of a company for any fraudulent purpose, the element of which are:◦carrying on the business of a company◦for a fraudulent purpose, and ◦knowingly being a party to that...
Discover our 6 Practice Notes on Fraudulent trading
Corporate criminal liability—code of ethics 1 Introduction 1.1 [Insert organisation name] takes great pride in the way we conduct our business. Our Code of ethics embodies the standards and policies under which we operate. It applies to us all. Please take care to read the Code, understand it, and use it to guide you in your work. If you have any questions about the Code and its application, you should speak with [insert, eg your manager]. 1.2 [Insert organisation name] has a zero tolerance towards employees committing criminal acts. 1.3 From 26 December 2023, the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 provides that where a senior manager, acting within the actual or apparent scope of their authority, commits a relevant offence, the organisation is also guilty of the offence. 2 Senior manager 2.1 A senior manager is someone who plays a significant role in: 2.1.1 making decisions about how the whole or a substantial part of the activities of the organisation are to be managed or organised; or 2.1.2...
Financial crime prevention—briefing for external agents/intermediaries 1 Introduction Compliance with financial crime prevention laws is critical to [insert organisation name][ and all its businesses]. To raise awareness, protect our reputation and avoid potential liability as a result of financial crime being committed by any of our business partners, we provide this briefing to all agents and intermediaries. As a partner, agent, consultant or other third party engaged to provide services for or act on behalf of [insert organisation name], you may be classed as an ‘associated person’ under relevant legislation and, as such, we can be held accountable for the actions you take on our behalf. It is therefore imperative that you: —understand and follow the same laws and policies that apply to us and our staff; —recognise when financial crime risks arise and know how to behave appropriately and in accordance with our policies in such situations; —make it clear to others that you and [insert organisation name] do not conduct business in an unethical manner;...
Dive into our 4 Precedents related to Fraudulent trading
This week's edition of Restructuring & Insolvency weekly highlights includes: the Supreme Court’s decision in Bilta (UK) Ltd and the scope of fraudulent trading under section 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), an examination of the restructuring plan sanctioned for Re Sino-Ocean Group Holding Ltd, the revocation of the recognition status of the Institute of Chartered Accountants Ireland (CAI) as a Recognised Professional Body (RPB), plus a round-up of other news and cases for restructuring and insolvency professionals.
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed both appeals. Applying ordinary principles of statutory interpretation, the court affirmed that the language of section 213 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) does not restrict liability to those involved in the management or control of the company’s business such as directors or managers, but could very well apply to someone routinely transacting with the company in the knowledge that the company was carrying on a fraudulent business. In addition, the court held that where claimant companies had been struck off and then later restored to the register, the deemed existence of the claimant companies during the period in which they were in fact in dissolution did not necessitate assuming that they lacked directors or other officers during that time. That was a question of probability to be determined on the evidence: the burden of proof was on the claimant companies and they had failed to discharge it. Accordingly, the dishonest assistance claim remained time-barred. Andrew Westwood KC, barrister practising from Maitland Chambers, comments...
Read the latest 6 News articles on Fraudulent trading
(1)Â Â Â Â If in the course of the winding up of a company it appears that any business of the company has been carried on with intent to defraud creditors of the company or creditors of any other person, or for any fraudulent purpose, the following has effect.(2)Â Â Â Â The court, on the application of the liquidator may declare that any persons who were knowingly parties to the carrying on of the business in the manner above-mentioned are to be liable to make such contributions (if any) to the company's assets as the court thinks proper.
[(1)Â Â Â Â If while a company is in administration it appears that any business of the company has been carried on with intent to defraud creditors of the company or creditors of any other person, or for any fraudulent purpose, the following has effect.(2)Â Â Â Â The court, on the application of the administrator, may declare that any persons who were knowingly parties to the carrying on of the business in the manner mentioned in subsection (1) are to be liable to make such contributions (if any) to the company's assets as the court
Fraudulent trading is referenced 3 in UK Parliament Acts
**Trials are provided to all ³ÉÈËÓ°Òô content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these ³ÉÈËÓ°Òô services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
0330 161 1234