Psychiatric injury—establishing liability


Published by a ³ÉÈËÓ°Òô PI & Clinical Negligence expert
Practice notes

Psychiatric injury—establishing liability


Published by a ³ÉÈËÓ°Òô PI & Clinical Negligence expert

Practice notes
imgtext

Liability for psychiatric injury is dependent in part on the nature of the injuries suffered and the manner in which they were sustained.

Classifying the victim

Where a claimant suffers both physical and psychiatric injury (even if the physical injury was very minor), they will be entitled to recover damages in the usual way subject to issues of causation etc. There will in such a case be no need to prove the foreseeability of the psychiatric injury if the physical injury was itself foreseeable.

The complexity arises where a claimant has suffered psychiatric injury but is physically unharmed.

In cases where claimants have suffered ‘pure’ psychiatric injury as a result of an accident or event, the law draws a distinction between:

  1. •

    primary victims—see below

  2. •

    secondary victims—see below

Primary victims

Primary victims are directly involved in the event and usually, but not necessarily, have physical injuries as well as psychiatric injuries.

For further guidance, see Practice Note: Psychiatric injury—primary victims.

Establishing liability—common law

To establish liability at common law a primary victim must show

Powered by Lexis+®
Jurisdiction(s):
United Kingdom
Related legal acts:
Key definition:
Damages definition
What does Damages mean?

The monetary compensation awarded by law to a person for the legal wrong done to him.

Read more readmore

Popular documents

Psychiatric injury—secondary victims—case tracker

Psychiatric injury—secondary victims—case trackerThis case tracker reviews the case law which has been decided since the lead case of Alcock v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police in 1991. Subsequent case law developed the concept of secondary victims and explored the extent that courts would allow

Psychiatric injury—establishing liability

Psychiatric injury—establishing liabilityLiability for psychiatric injury is dependent in part on the nature of the injuries suffered and the manner in which they were sustained.Classifying the victimWhere a claimant suffers both physical and psychiatric injury (even if the physical injury was very

The employer’s duty of care

The employer’s duty of careOverriding dutiesAt common law, an employer is under a duty to take reasonable care of the health and safety of its employees in all the circumstances of the case so as not to expose them to an unnecessary risk.This duty of care extends to the employee’s physical and

Limitation in noise-induced hearing loss claims

Limitation in noise-induced hearing loss claimsLimitation is almost always an issue in noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) claims.The typical claimant is someone who was exposed to noise at work much more than three years before they approached a solicitor enquiring about a claim. They are therefore